It looks like the plastic bottle is here to stay, despite publicity about bisphenol A and other chemicals that may leach into liquids inside the bottle. Plastic bottles (which had been used for some kind of consumer product) are the feedstock for what is known as “post-consumer recycled polyester”. Recycled polyester, also called rPET, is now accepted as a “sustainable” product in the textile market. In textiles, most of what passes for “sustainable” claims by manufacturers have some sort of recycled polyester in the mix, because it’s a message that can be easily understood by consumers – and polyester is much cheaper than natural fibers.
The recycled market today has lots of unused capacity – as well as great potential for growth, because the recycling rates in many high consumption areas (like Europe and the USA) are low but growing. In Europe, collection rates for bottles rose to 46% of all PET bottles on the market, while in the US the rate is 27%. Factories are investing in technology and increasing their capacity – so the demand is huge. According to Ecotextile News, beggars in China will literally stand watching people drink so that they can ask for the empty bottle.
As the size of the recycled polyester market grows, we think the integrity of the sustainability claims for polyesters will become increasingly important. There has not been the same level of traceability for polyesters as there is for organically labelled products. According to Ecotextile News, this is due (at least in part) to the lack of import legislation for recycled goods.
When you buy a fabric that claims it’s made of 100% post-consumer polyester – how do you know that the fibres are 100% post-consumer? Is there a certification that assures us that the fibres really are what the manufacturer says they are? And it’s widely touted that recycling polyester uses just 30 – 50% of the energy needed to make virgin polyester – but is that true in every case? And what about water use – it’s widely thought that water use needed to recycle polyester is low, but who’s looking to see that this is true?
Recycled post-consumer polyester is made from bottles – which have been collected, sorted by hand, and then melted down and formed into chips (sometimes called flakes). These chips or flakes are then sent to the yarn spinning mills, where they’re melted down and (if not used at 100% rates) mixed with virgin polyester. A fabric made of “recycled polyester” has a designated percentage of those chips in the polymer. The technology has gotten so sophisticated that it’s now difficult to verify if something is really recycled.
First, let’s look at how the recycled polyester is used in textiles, beyond the issue of whether the recycled PET yarns actually ARE spun from recycled feedstock, because there are several issues with using recycled PET which is unique to the textile industry:
The base colour of the recycled chips varies from white to creamy yellow. This makes it difficult to get consistent dyelots, especially for pale colours/shades. In order to get a consistently white base, some dyers use chlorine-based bleaches. Dye uptake can be inconsistent, so the dyer would need to re-dye the batch. There are high levels of redyeing, leading to increased energy use.PVC is often used in PET labels and wrappers and adhesives. If the wrappers and labels from the bottles used in the post consumer chips had not been properly removed and washed, PVC may be introduced into the polymer. Some fabrics are forgiving in terms of appearance and lend themselves to variability in yarns, such as fleece and carpets; fine gauge plain fabrics are much more difficult to achieve.
And of course, the chemicals used to dye the polymers as well as the processing methods used during weaving of the fabric may – or may not – be optimized to be environmentally benign. Water used during weaving of the fabric may – or may not – be treated. And the workers may – or may not – be paid a fair wage.
One solution, suggested by Ecotextile News, is to create a tracking system that follows the raw material through to the final product. This would be very labour intensive and would require a lot of monitoring (all of which adds to the cost of production – and don’t forget, recycled polyester now is fashion’s darling because it’s so cheap!). There are also private standards that have begun to pop up, in an effort to differentiate their brands. One fibre supplier which has gone the private standard route is Unifi. Repreve is the name of Unifi’s recycled polyester – the company produces recycled polyester yarns, and (at least for the filament yarns) they have Scientific Certification Systems certify that Repreve yarns are made with 100% recycled content. Unifi’s “fiberprint” technology audits orders across the supply chain to verify that if Repreve is in a product it’s present in the right amounts. But there are still many unanswered questions (because they’re considered “proprietary information” by Unifi) so the process is not transparent.
But now there is a new, third party certification that is addressing these issues. The Global Recycle Standard, issued by Control Union, is intended to establish independently verified claims as to the amount of recycled content in a yarn. In addition to the certification of the recycled content, this new standard holds the weaver to similar standards as found in the Global Organic Textile Standard:
companies must keep full records of the use of chemicals, energy, water consumption and waste water treatment including the disposal of sludgeall wastewater must be treated for pH, temperature, COD and BOD before disposal;there is an extensive section related to worker’s health and safety.
In the end, polyester – whether recycled or virgin – is plastic.
I came across the work of a photographer living in Seattle, Chris Jordan, who published photographs of albatross chicks which he made in September, 2009, on Midway Atoll, a tiny stretch of sand and coral near the middle of the North Pacific. As he says, “The nesting babies are fed bellies-full of plastic by their parents, who soar out over the vast polluted ocean collecting what looks to them like food to bring back to their young. On this diet of human trash, every year tens of thousands of albatross chicks die on Midway from starvation, toxicity, and choking.
To document this phenomenon as faithfully as possible, not a single piece of plastic in any of these photographs was moved, placed, manipulated, arranged, or altered in any way. These images depict the actual stomach contents of baby birds in one of the world’s most remote marine sanctuaries, more than 2000 miles from the nearest continent.” See more at Chris Jordan’s website here.
To make things worse, these tiny pieces of plastic are extremely powerful chemical accumulators for organic persistent pollutants present in ambient seawater such as DDE’s and PCB’s. The whole food chain, from invertebrates to fish, turtles and mammals … are eating plastic and /or other animals who have plastic in them.
If you’re shocked by this picture, remember that this was brought to our attention years ago by National Geographic Magazine and in reports by scientists from many organizations. One of the things they warned us of is the Great Pacific Garbage Patch, which has doubled in size while we have done nothing. I am shocked that we have done nothing while the cascading effects of our disposable society continue to accumulate.
Originally posted by https://oecotextiles.wordpress.com/2010/03/31/issues-with-using-recycled-polyester/